. . . And Now the NL Cy Young

When I was a college student, my school announced that they would be bringing concerts onto campus. Not the top names, like Bruce Springsteen and the Grateful Dead, but second-tier acts.

In my mind, that meant The Police and Tom Petty & the Heartbreakers. Because as an American, I was a hopeless front-runner. If you weren't number one, why even bother?

In fact, the school was booking bands that were not played regularly on the radio and did not sell out arenas. Second-tier meant bands that had to tour to earn a living. The Michael Stanley Band. John Hiatt. Nazareth. I couldn't believe that they actually wanted to charge us to see these no-accounts.

We're the same way with sports. If Johnny Cueto isn't the best pitcher in the National League, doesn't lead the league in wins or winning percentage or ERA or complete games or quality starts or innings pitched or VORP or strikeouts -- well, how well could he have pitched?

The answer is: remarkably well. Johnny Cueto is a candidate for the NL Cy Young. He's not the best candidate, but he threw 217 innings of 2.78 ERA ball, fanned three-and-a-half times as many batters as he walked and provided the Cincinnati Reds with 23 quality starts. Do that for 10 years as they start carving bronze of your likeness in Upstate New York.

There are quite a few pitchers, as it turns out, who fall into this same category. Cole Hamels struck out 216 batters in 215 frames and posted a 3.05 ERA in the run factory in Philadelphia. Gio Gonzalez won 21 games with a 2.89 ERA and whiffed 207 batters in 199 innings. Stephen Strasburg might have been the best pitcher in the NL until the Nats shut him down with more than a month to go.  Matt Cain served as ace for the World Champs, going 16-5, 2.79 while Adam Wainwright gave another great performance, 20-11, 2.42.

But this post isn't about those gentlemen, fearsome they may be when standing 60.5 feet away. This is about the top act, the number one best pitcher in the National League. The two hurlers who will battle for that distinction are Clayton Kershaw and R.A. Dickey. A pair as different as Abbot and Costello. The young fireballer against the veteran knuckleballer. The suddenly-flush Dodgers against the cash-strapped Mets. The phenom versus the phenomenon.

But Kershaw and Dickey do have two important things in common. Both pitch in stadiums designed for pitching stats and both made hitters mutter this season.

Kershaw's peformance looks like this: 
14-9, 2.53 in 228 innings and 25 quality starts. He struck out a batter an inning with a 3.63 K/BB ratio.

Dickey was even better:
20-6, 2.73 in 234 innings and 27 quality starts. He struck out not quite a batter an innings with a 4.26 K/BB ratio.

In fact, although Kershaw posted the league's lowest ERA, Dickey is first in innings, strikeouts, K/BB ratio, complete games, and quality starts among top Cy Young candidates. He also throws that groovy speed-knuckler and offers sportswriters the best opportunity to write about perseverance and redemption, and to weave a heart-tugging tale in which the good guy finishes first, Durocher be damned.

You could certainly make a case for Kershaw and for several others as well. But Dickey is the best choice not only because we want him to be, but also because while Kershaw logged two-thirds of his innings in the Ravine and performed significantly less brilliantly away from home, Dickey proved he was not a Citi Field Phenomenon. At 10-3, 2.90 with a better K/BB record on the road, Dickey was the best pitcher in the NL no matter where he performed.